Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-04-05 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-04-05 House Journal Page 2650 HB 364 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 4, 2008, calendar (page 2610), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 364(FIN) "An Act relating to notice and consent for a minor's abortion; relating to penalties for performing an abortion; relating to a judicial bypass procedure for an abortion; relating to coercion of a minor to have an abortion; relating to reporting of abortions performed on minors; amending Rule 220, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Rule 20, Alaska Probate Rules, relating to judicial bypass for an abortion; and providing for an effective date." The question being: "Shall CSHB 364(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 364(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 23 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fairclough, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Kelly, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Buch, Cissna, Crawford, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Salmon, Seaton Excused: Holmes Absent: Nelson And so, CSHB 364(FIN) passed the House. 2008-04-05 House Journal Page 2651 Representative Samuels moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 364(FIN) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 29 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Cissna, Crawford, Doll, Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kerttula Excused: Holmes Absent: Nelson And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the effective date clause be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Kerttula later gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 364(FIN).